there are some tips on how to do your discussion. (=
- Start with the major findings in your work. Explain why such findings should have occurred and discuss other possible explanations
- It is then logical to compare with other similar works, explaining the possible reasons for the differences. This will bring up the limitations of the study and suggestions for future work.
- Do not gloss over the limitations of the study-a true researcher knows that this may set the tone for future work.
- State the immediate clinical relevance of your findings clearly.
- Touch upon the direction-'Where do we go from here and what needs to be done next.'
- A discussion can have a conclusion-one line with the sum and substance of the whole paper, for example, 'Bronchial artery embolization is useful in treating patients having massive hemoptysis due to pulmonary TB . '
Hope it can help you guys! (=
No comments:
Post a Comment